凤凰彩票下载app-凤凰彩票充值
凤凰彩票计划2023-01-31 16:05

《中国奇谭》好在哪儿******

  提起上海美术电影制片厂,许多80后、90后,乃至60后、70后,都会会心一笑,想起儿时看过的《大闹天宫》《哪吒闹海》《天书奇谭》《黑猫警长》等经典作品。遥想当年,这些作品陪伴一代又一代人走过了孩提时代,也代表中国动画,在国际舞台上创建了一张张独具特色的“文化名片”。

  光阴飞逝,中国动画在“美术片”时代创下的辉煌,已经开始在人们的记忆中渐渐淡去。走过低谷、历经磨砺,在“国创”风潮的引领下,中国动画行业终于又在最近几年重见曙光。不过,虽然“出圈”的国产动画一年比一年多,市场反响也一年比一年好,质量和口碑特别出众的作品仍属凤毛麟角。

  在这一背景下,一部名为《中国奇谭》的短片集开播不久,就在豆瓣收获了7万多名观众打出的9.5分高分。制作这部短片集的,正是曾经的“美术片王者”上海美术电影制片厂。

  进入21世纪以来,20世纪“美术片”在观众眼中的存在感日益降低,新生代中国动画的风格,一方面明显受到日本、欧美等成熟动画市场的影响,另一方面也在积极迎合当代青少年的审美偏好。然而,《中国奇谭》的出现与成功,却让人意识到:“美术片”的时代虽然已经结束,中国动画过去积攒的审美资源、风格资源,以及中国特有的文化资源、思想资源,依然值得在今天被进一步发掘,并以此为起点展开“有传承的创新”。

  已经播出的几集《中国奇谭》,为何能如此成功?这个问题的答案,当然要在原片内容中寻找。第一集《小妖怪的夏天》,是与上世纪“美术片”亲缘最近的一集。不论是源自《西游记》的文化背景、传承清晰的经典美术风格,还是极具辨识度的孙悟空形象,都足以令熟悉中国动画发展史的观众热泪盈眶。然而,《小妖怪的夏天》虽然让人感到似曾相识,却并非对老作品的模仿复刻。其故事线以妖怪洞府暗喻当代职场,年轻上班族一看就懂。以无名小妖而非取经四人组为主角,劝人向善、充满温暖的叙事方式,也让人眼前一亮。

  除此之外,第二集《鹅鹅鹅》的水墨画风、默片手法,以及“聊斋味”十足又善于留白、让人回味悠长的开放式剧情;第三集《林林》将国风融入3D动画的大胆尝试,对东北自然风貌的浪漫呈现,以及对人与自然关系的思考……这些富有特色的亮点,都传递着主创团队的独到见解,以及支撑他们把这些间接转化为作品的勇气与诚意。从工业水平上看,《中国奇谭》的项目规模决定了它不可能追求顶尖水准。但它胜在创意、胜在真诚、胜在其内里的“中国基因”。

  《中国奇谭》最早打响名号,与《小妖怪的夏天》自带的“情怀”属性密切相关,《鹅鹅鹅》更加独特,但也会让人想起《小蝌蚪找妈妈》等水墨老片。不过,从《林林》开始,我们已经可以明显看到《中国奇谭》一边背靠传统资源,一边探索全新世界的勇气。通过预告可以发现,从第四集开始,《中国奇谭》甚至会脱离古代背景,来到现代乃至未来。目前,我们并不知道《中国奇谭》的评分能保持多久,尚未播出的几集短片质量几何,但我们不妨对此抱有期待,看看它们能达到怎样的高度。

  杨鑫宇

  来源:中国青年报

凤凰彩票下载app

中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

  中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。

  2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

  日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

  日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

  事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。

  因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。

  日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

  《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

  德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

  日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

  国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。

  太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。

  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

  By John Lee

  (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

  Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

  The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

  On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

  The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

  In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

  Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

  The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

  The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

  The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

  According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

  As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

  However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

  Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

  The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

  If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.

 

中国网客户端

国家重点新闻网站,9语种权威发布

凤凰彩票地图